3 ms·
That[1] was interesting, but apparently, the theory is not widely accepted as fact. “The scientific community finds that significant evidence contradicts the E
by Samuel_Michon 13y ago
That[1] was interesting, but apparently, the theory is not widely accepted as fact.
“The scientific community finds that significant evidence contradicts the Expanding Earth theory, and that evidence used in support of it is better explained by plate tectonics” [2]
[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kL7qDeI05U http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kL7qDeI05U
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_Earth#Scientific_consensus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_Earth#Scientific_cons...
- ffrryuu 13y agoSure, but it makes far more sense than that pangea theory, kinda like ether theory from back then. The smaller earth -> lighter gravity -> larger insects are able to support their huge body without skeleton, and larger living beings in general In short it keeps on making more sense the more you think about it. Plus the speculation of mass being generated in the core of the Earth is just sexy.