3 ms·

Why isn't that the point? If the author really wanted to get people "on his side", he should have included Digital Ocean's side, specifically the part of their

by dkuntz2 13y ago

Why isn't that the point? If the author really wanted to get people "on his side", he should have included Digital Ocean's side, specifically the part of their TOS they claimed was being violated.

aquadrop 13y ago
As I understand, he included it. That response from the support is the only information author has.
manojlds 13y ago
> Why isn't that the point? I said that IS the point. > he should have included Digital Ocean's side OP claims they didn't give any