3 ms·
On point 2), humans are still very much "social animals", and time and time again I see that business works a lot better face to face, and trust is much more ea
by GFischer 13y ago
On point 2), humans are still very much "social animals", and time and time again I see that business works a lot better face to face, and trust is much more easily gained.
That has been repeatedly established, and there are very strong reasons why people with very limited time still travel a lot of hours to conduct their business.
Not everyone is the same, but it is the norm rather than the exception.
http://www.iacconline.org/content/files/WhyFace-to-FaceBusinessMeetingsMatter.pdf http://www.iacconline.org/content/files/WhyFace-to-FaceBusin...
From the paper:
"From a psychological perspective there are a number of positive features about faceto-face meetings that cannot always be achieved as well via other forms of
communication.
Face-to-face meetings allow members to engage in and observe verbal and nonverbal behavioral styles not captured in most computer mediated communication
devises. There are nuances associated with hand gestures, voice quality and
volume, facial expressions, and so forth that are simply not captured in email
discussion, chat rooms, and the like. Even videoconferencing does not capture all of
the dynamics of group members (e.g. the expression of others while one member is
talking, etc.).
A further advantage of face-to-face meetings is that they occur in “real time” as
opposed to non-synchronized time. Computer mediated communications often are
delayed because of a variety of reasons, not always received, and sometimes
disrupted because of technical problems.
Another feature is simply the fact that face-to-face business meetings provide human
contact among members. Human contact is a primitive need among human beings.
We are social creatures and isolation is harmful. A recent article in the New Yorker
magazine8
discussed the impact of social isolation and concluded that “simply to
exist as a normal human being requires interaction with other people” (p. 36). There
is much psychological research affirming this proposition—that individuals need
personal contact with others to satisfy deep primitive psychological needs. Face-toface business meetings help meet these needs. Emailing and even teleconferences
are not as likely to meet these needs, notwithstanding the enormous popularity of
Facebook which basically provides electronic connections between social “friends”.
However, the popularity of this website suggests that people might be even hungrier
for social friends than can be satisfied in their present day-to-day work and personal
lives.
Similarly, business meetings allow participants opportunities to develop important
exchange relationships among themselves. These exchanges can be in the form of
business negotiations, personal favors, promises, understandings, etc. that cannot
often be achieved via other forms of communication because of their personal and
informal nature. One psychological theory that emphasizes this notion is “social
exchange theory” where human relations are viewed as an exchange of rewards
among individuals or achieving equity between “what you put in” compared to “what
you get out” of relationships."
http://www.forbes.com/forbesinsights/Business_Meetings_FaceToFace/ http://www.forbes.com/forbesinsights/Business_Meetings_FaceT...
http://online.wsj.com/ad/article/globaltravel-face http://online.wsj.com/ad/article/globaltravel-face
- hershel 13y agoThere are technologies today , for example teleconference rooms, which probably capture most verbal and non-verbal feedbackin meetings, to the points participants claim it's like being there. It would be interesting to do an experiment:isolate someone for a period of time, but let him have full contact with family and friends via the best electronic means we have , and measure the impact of his mood and well-being.
- GFischer 13y agoIt's funny, because, while I'm not extremely isolated, I have lived through periods of my life when all my family was abroad (I stayed in Uruguay, most emigrated, others studied abroad), and I have few local friends. No amount of telephone calls, chats, Facebook or Skyping can compare to in-person interaction. I have a photo of a recent Christmas, with 3 screens with Skype calls to family in Canada and Europe on each screen, and while it helps to "be" there more than just a phone call, it's still nowhere near the same. It is of course anecdotal, but that was my experience. I didn't have a full-wall videoscreen with HD, maybe for a limited environment like a meeting it can be a very reasonable simulation... but at least in Latin countries like mine, "real" negotiations and bonding/trust building occur over a shared meal or other shared experiences, which cannot be currently simulated. Going back to the original topic: business air travel isn't dying soon. Maybe some inmersive 3-d environment will finally kill it (and we'll see Second Life as an innovation before its time, much like the Apple Newton?)
- hershel 13y agoBut skype does miss eye-contact and picture of half body (to get all hand movements which are important) , and the illusion of being in the same room created by telepresence , and probably had worse latency , and probably other factors i'm not aware of. And we know from the "uncanny valley" that humans are very very sensitive to little things in human/human communication. So it might just be that telepresence offers a altogether different quality of experience. And regarding the topic - currently , maybe business air travel isn't dying(thought in 2009 there was a lot of talk about disruption from telepresence). But assuming we'll find the formula for remote face to face communications, and assuming there's enough bandwidth, the pace of change could be rapid(unless people will keep sticking with tradition, which might be the thing now that slows the process). Anyway, i would be really interested to see major deployment of telepresence quality systems deployed in homes, and how that would affect culture.