why do all these bullshit pieces get posted and upvoted. author complains about incremental innovation as not innovative, then offer better batteries as true i

why do all these bullshit pieces get posted and upvoted. author complains about incremental innovation as not innovative, then offer better batteries as true innovation. same author does not see the iphone itself as incremental to the BB, Nokia Communicator and the other smartphones Mr.Jobs was citing on stage when launching the first iPhone. and people wonder why journalism is dead. how do distinguish between a random neckbeard blog spouting nonsense and a "real" publication like wired? quality of texts is the same. christensen's disruptive innovation book has been a great disservice to the world. now everyone babbels about innovation and disruption, with no clue what it really means. and guess what, DI is not a universal truth either, can't explain a lot of successful companies.