12 ms·
Nvidia has been good when it comes to proprietary drivers on Linux, but they've never helped out with open source drivers. Then this happened on the same day as
by jfoster 13y ago
Nvidia has been good when it comes to proprietary drivers on Linux, but they've never helped out with open source drivers. Then this happened on the same day as the SteamOS announcement. It's quite a massive coincidence if it is one. Nvidia's refusal to help out with open source drivers has been a controversial issue in the Linux community for at least a decade or so. I'd be very surprised if SteamOS played no role in this.
- pedrocr 13y ago> they've never helped out with open source drivers I think that's only true when it comes to 3D drivers. They wrote the 2D nv driver: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/nv/ http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/nv/ I do remember people complaining it was full of magic numbers to obfuscate what it was doing but it was indeed open source and written by nvidia.
- tobiasu 13y agoThe nv driver exists for the single purpose of getting into a working desktop, so one can install the proprietary driver. It is not intended as decent 2D-only driver or anything like that.
- xiaomai 13y agoI don't know think this is a fair assessment; wouldn't having users fall-back on the vesa driver be sufficient for what you are describing? The nv driver supports extensions like xv, so I've always found it was fine for my 2D needs.
- tobiasu 13y agoThat is the reasoning I've heard (read on the ML) from nvidia employees working on said driver.
- jfoster 13y agoYes, I stand corrected on that.