3 ms·
You are missing the point. If a company publishes a "Transparency Report" that is woefully incomplete, they shouldn't call it a "Transparency Report", should t
by huhtenberg 13y ago
You are missing the point.
If a company publishes a "Transparency Report" that is woefully incomplete, they shouldn't call it a "Transparency Report", should they now? They effectively fudge the numbers to make things look better than they are.
- StavrosK 13y agoWhen the alternative is to not post the report at all, I think I'll take the chance.
- oleganza 13y agoI agree. However, it's called "Transparency Report" and not "This is the best we can tell you to avoid jail" to avoid jail. Alternative would be not to publish anything. Any freedom-fighting statement (while straight to the point and honorable) is a quick suicide. Point me to a business in US which openly opposes core government institutions and does well.
- jasonlotito 13y agoSo your complaint is that they didn't name it well enough? Not that they didn't make it clear in several places that this doesn't include national security requests, of which they are legally obligated not to provide.
- lotsofcows 13y agoAre things either completely transparent or opaque? Can I still call my motorbike's windscreen so, even though it only blocks a very small mount of wind? Should people below median height be allowed to say how "tall" they are?