3 ms·
Then we should "fix" that. Instead, we've been letting the government give these companies immunities for letting them gather the data in bulk from them. I thi
by devx 13y ago
Then we should "fix" that. Instead, we've been letting the government give these companies immunities for letting them gather the data in bulk from them.
I think people just want to communicate with each other, and the Internet is the best way to do that right now. If we can build an Internet where we can easily do that without giving all this data to 3rd parties, people would use that, but until then they don't have much choice.
As Schneier says, advising people to "quit Google" or Facebook, is not really a choice in today's Internet. But if developers and the architects of the Internet realize what a problem this is, then maybe we can come up with other more secure alternative solutions.
- chris_mahan 13y agoit would have to be one where the NSA armed goons can't walk into a room full of servers and tell the admin: "Do what we tell you or else." Essentially, we're going back to computers in the house doing everything, since the network can't be trusted, and encryption can't be trusted.