4 ms·
How is this anything more than a self-interested puff piece? (As an investor, the founders' success is his success, right?) The topic is an interesting one, an
by geekfactor 13y ago
How is this anything more than a self-interested puff piece? (As an investor, the founders' success is his success, right?)
The topic is an interesting one, and an article exploring the net impact of under-the-radar companies versus the high fliers on the Silicon Valley, US and global economies, particularly one that presents some data, could be very enlightening.
- lmg643 13y agoi would argue for the opposite of this article - it serves the public's interest for successful companies to be known. we might want to become customers. we might learn something that applies to our business. it is a public good to know where power and influence lies. and it is good to know so others will compete with them. :) i think the reason why a lot of firms shy away from publicity is that if you're making money, you don't need people to know about it - can attract competition. a lot of the publicity heavy firms are profitless - they hope to make money based on users or attention.
- geekfactor 13y agoI don't think you're arguing for the opposite of what I'm proposing and I agree with you. I would just like to see some substance, whether in broad terms of the overall market or a narrower look at specific firms.