I'm just saying the headline is ambiguous, and Paul Graham did not start 145 companies as a founder. I don't see why that seems to trivialize his role. It's not

I'm just saying the headline is ambiguous, and Paul Graham did not start 145 companies as a founder. I don't see why that seems to trivialize his role. It's not as if I said he doesn't advise the founders. I know some HNers can get quite defensive of PG, but it really isn't necessary here.