4 ms·
The core seems much more interesting than the Pawn language. I'd like to see more comparisons once this matures. A few points: 1. I'd like to see the FFI impl
by smilekzs 13y ago
The core seems much more interesting than the Pawn language. I'd like to see more comparisons once this matures.
A few points:
1. I'd like to see the FFI implemented natively (i.e. by declaring in Solid and registering through C code/macro, instead of relying on object file parsing). Then it'll be extremely useful in a bare-metal microcontroller environment.
2. Namespacing is needed -- I don't really want `parse_xxx` or `ast_node` in my global namespace!
- chameco 13y agoYeah, the namespacing is somewhat poor, sorry about that. I'll get around to prefixing the names at some point.