> So your point is that there should be no shared dependencies You can have both, where it makes sense, instead of everything being shared by default (e.g., yo

> So your point is that there should be no shared dependencies You can have both, where it makes sense, instead of everything being shared by default (e.g., you can provide all your software a base OpenSSL version). See how FreeBSD solves that with jails and sharedfs. > or centralized collections of trusted software? All you need for that is app signing (e.g., App Store). You can still update apps independently, there's no dependency management.