4 ms·
Well, so it's hard to do in part because you need code to load code, and there's only 64 words of RAM. But if you got the code to the core, let's say you're on
by daniel-cussen 13y ago
Well, so it's hard to do in part because you need code to load code, and there's only 64 words of RAM. But if you got the code to the core, let's say you're only changing 32 words of code, about five-ten functions, you'd have to use 32* ~10 ns = 320 ns to do the reload. Not too shabby, but you have to get it there, and that means using other cores. It's hard, but in theory there is no outstanding reason it would be a problem. Is the GA144 a poor fit? Barring that you crack the problem of getting the code there, yes, it's a poor fit.
- gruseom 13y agoI'd forgotten that there's so little RAM to work with. It might be doable; the blocks I'm talking about are mostly very primitive operations. Do you think the benefits are valuable enough to be worth all the trouble of figuring out how to program this architecture, or is it more just a fun puzzle?