3 ms·
I think the final paragraph points out the obvious point - social mobility has never really fully existed. Previously large swathes of the workforce were never
by cmdkeen 13y ago
I think the final paragraph points out the obvious point - social mobility has never really fully existed. Previously large swathes of the workforce were never expected or enabled to progress - women and ethnic minorities.
When they are included I doubt the golden age looks so golden from the point of view of "everyone" suddenly getting rich off the economic returns of work.
Now the economy is much more open to merit - the problem with meritocracy (as the article points out) is that once you open it to everyone whole swathes of people lose out. See the trends of successful women marrying successful men thus creating a more closed top tier of society.
- VLM 13y ago"Previously large swathes of the workforce were never expected or enabled to progress" The article listed several reasons why little social turmoil was expected... I suspect the old "divide and conqueror" will be applied to the above historical facts. "Sure we're all getting poorer, but the white guys are getting poorer at a faster rate than we are, so its OK". I suspect this will be a popular "calming" strategy.