2 ms·
The ad application is interesting; I hadn't been thinking along those lines at all... I considered using public keys, but I didn't want the resulting encoded t
by dpapathanasiou 13y ago
The ad application is interesting; I hadn't been thinking along those lines at all...
I considered using public keys, but I didn't want the resulting encoded tweet to be illegible or look like gibberish.
The conceit here is that even a secret message looks completely innocent, something that no eavesdropper would notice as being out of the ordinary (though the middle dot marker does give it away, to people paying attention).
- akkartik 13y agoAnother idea: use a corpus of tweets to retweet.
- dpapathanasiou 13y agoYes, that's the simplest way to make the encoded tweets look natural, i.e., truly steganographic, but it's a fine balancing act between that and not making the corpus obvious.
- akkartik 13y agoIs it a big deal if it's obvious that the corpus is of tweets? There's many many ways to build one and order the tweets, right?
- dpapathanasiou 13y agoThe content of the corpus doesn't matter, so the answer to your first question is no, and yes, if you're clever in terms of how you've composed the corpus so that no one could re-create it easily, then it's ok (relatively speaking, of course).