It is very hard for me to have sympathy for someone who spent 5+ years at a great school, likely funded, in a useful discipline that struggles to get a job. I

It is very hard for me to have sympathy for someone who spent 5+ years at a great school, likely funded, in a useful discipline that struggles to get a job. I would like to hear from academic departments on why they said no the academic superstar from Stanford. I would like to hear from IBM and Microsoft on why they couldn't use him. That's what's missing. Maybe it's entitlement? Some of that creeps into the article. Maybe it's a personality that just isn't agreeable? Some of that is in the article too.