4 ms·
Isn't HornetQ the queue that allows one "ack" to speak for the past five messages. That is, if I were to lose one of the past five messages I sent, I would neve
by wheaties 13y ago
Isn't HornetQ the queue that allows one "ack" to speak for the past five messages. That is, if I were to lose one of the past five messages I sent, I would never know because the system would consider the message delivered. To me, that is a severe flaw and could open you up to a nightmare of debugging if used improperly. Either go full acks or go ack-less.
- leif 13y agoSounds like mongodb's batched write semantics.
- twic 13y agoI haven't heard of any such problem with HornetQ. If this was unavoidable behaviour, then it would be impossible to correctly implement the JMS specification, i think. I fear you may be mistaken, although i would be very interested to hear more about this if not.