4 ms·
Perhaps more useful if you already know enough to know when to ignore the awful or wrong parts of w3schools. Damn those "hipsters" and their preference for val
by freshhawk 13y ago
Perhaps more useful if you already know enough to know when to ignore the awful or wrong parts of w3schools.
Damn those "hipsters" and their preference for valuing getting a real useful answer over an easy to read wrong answer!
- cpncrunch 13y agoPlease give some examples of the "awful" or "wrong" parts.
- timmclean 13y agow3fools.com had, at one point in time, a long list of "awful" and "wrong" parts: http://web.archive.org/web/20110117085131/http://w3fools.com/ http://web.archive.org/web/20110117085131/http://w3fools.com...
- cpncrunch 13y agoI had a look through quite a few of these, and they all seem to be fixed now. Also quite a few of the things mentioned are opinions. There were also a few instances where I noticed w3fools was wrong. Anyway, I see why w3fools decided to remove the list of now-fixed "errors". Thanks for wasting 15 minutes of my time - I'll bill you later :) PS, your website fails w3c validation.