3 ms·
I really love MDN, and in some ways I feel guilty for doing this. I've been a MDN contributor. But the MDN information architecture/navigation is terrible, the
by kixxauth 13y ago
I really love MDN, and in some ways I feel guilty for doing this. I've been a MDN contributor.
But the MDN information architecture/navigation is terrible, the crowd sourced content is inconsistent, the pages load very slowly. When you put it all together, it's difficult to focus on winning the search engine game with those flaws.
There was a "Better JS docs" movement a few years ago that moved the needle a little, but in the end it was just the wrong content to do the job.
- ubernostrum 13y agoMDN is, in the near future, launching a redesign. Might be worth checking it out. (source: I work for Mozilla, on MDN)
- sequoia 13y ago> the crowd sourced content is inconsistent You don't plan on crowd sourcing content? You're going to write all these documents, tutorials, cheat sheets and videos by yourself?
- dinkumthinkum 13y agoYou realize there used to be these very useful, very accurate things written by either one or very few persons ... they were called "books" ... They were kind of a crazy idea, I admit ...