4 ms·

I was once banned from using ternary operators, that was weird

enjo 17y ago
have you ever seen them abused ? you'd understand why : (or at least have you thought about it ? you'd understand why : (or at least you can get the gist from this ? good : I can't help you))
- erlanger 17y ago
  In a similar vein: Have you read the Drupal source ? Exactly : Take a look
- jcromartie 17y ago
  That was perfectly clear to me... :D
  - Oxryly 17y ago
    Same here :)
  - donaq 17y ago
    I think what he meant was more something like this: $row[6] = $src?str_replace($src,($table[$src]?$table[$src]:$src),$row[6]):$row[6]; [Edit] It's not quite so clear when it's not in English, methinks.
- Xichekolas 17y ago
  You can use the ternary operator without abusing it. That said, that made complete sense.
- twoz 17y ago
  <?="I","smarty pants"?"don'tget":"see";?>it.
- deleted 17y ago
  [deleted]
- crpatino 17y ago
  have you ever seen them abused ? you'd understand why : (or at least have you thought about it ? you'd understand why : (or at least you can get the gist from this ? good : I can't help you)) Sorry, not perfect but with some indentation would do the job quite nice. Sometimes is not what you write, it is what you don't ;)
  - sharkbrainguy 17y ago
    also, aren't the parens redundant?
  - GrandMasterBirt 17y ago
    My post below:
- psyklic 17y ago
  Actually, this is even better than a normal post since I can terminate early without reading the rest ;-)
- mkn 17y ago
  I guess it all depends: seen them in tabular format ? you know they're great : have you seen them abused ? you think you know : have you thought about it ? you think you know : get the gist from this ? good : I can't help you ;
  - jibiki 17y ago
    That's quite a bit more readable than the equivalent tower of ifs and elses.
  - emilis_info 17y ago
    Would this be like (cond) in lisp? (cond ((seen-them in-tabular-format) '(you know they are great)) ...)

enjo 17y ago

have you ever seen them abused ? you'd understand why : (or at least have you thought about it ? you'd understand why : (or at least you can get the gist from this ? good : I can't help you))

erlanger 17y ago
In a similar vein: Have you read the Drupal source ? Exactly : Take a look
jcromartie 17y ago
That was perfectly clear to me... :D
- Oxryly 17y ago
  Same here :)
- donaq 17y ago
  I think what he meant was more something like this: $row[6] = $src?str_replace($src,($table[$src]?$table[$src]:$src),$row[6]):$row[6]; [Edit] It's not quite so clear when it's not in English, methinks.
Xichekolas 17y ago
You can use the ternary operator without abusing it. That said, that made complete sense.
twoz 17y ago
<?="I","smarty pants"?"don'tget":"see";?>it.
deleted 17y ago
[deleted]
crpatino 17y ago
have you ever seen them abused ? you'd understand why : (or at least have you thought about it ? you'd understand why : (or at least you can get the gist from this ? good : I can't help you)) Sorry, not perfect but with some indentation would do the job quite nice. Sometimes is not what you write, it is what you don't ;)
- sharkbrainguy 17y ago
  also, aren't the parens redundant?
- GrandMasterBirt 17y ago
  My post below:
psyklic 17y ago
Actually, this is even better than a normal post since I can terminate early without reading the rest ;-)
mkn 17y ago
I guess it all depends: seen them in tabular format ? you know they're great : have you seen them abused ? you think you know : have you thought about it ? you think you know : get the gist from this ? good : I can't help you ;
- jibiki 17y ago
  That's quite a bit more readable than the equivalent tower of ifs and elses.
- emilis_info 17y ago
  Would this be like (cond) in lisp? (cond ((seen-them in-tabular-format) '(you know they are great)) ...)