Sure, they can use their First Amendment rights to support whatever candidate they want. But when said candidate gets elected and pushes a law through that dire

Sure, they can use their First Amendment rights to support whatever candidate they want. But when said candidate gets elected and pushes a law through that directly benefits the contributor to the detriment of the people, then the free market is dead. At that point you have crony capitalism. I don't see anything in your paragraph disputing my statement. You are describing things leading up to the mistakes of the doctor while I describe what happens afterwards. Are you saying that crony capitalism doesn't exist? Because that's the only way I would agree with your No True Scotsman fallacy accusation. Seems to me you are attempting to make yourself appear clever with your condescending statement instead of actually addressing my point.