Business Insider, like Gawker and Valleywag, is best ignored if you want to learn anything substantive about the way the tech industry actually works, let alone

Business Insider, like Gawker and Valleywag, is best ignored if you want to learn anything substantive about the way the tech industry actually works, let alone learn anything about how tech actually works (God, their reviews of gadgets and descriptions of startups are horrible). Not to say that the actual events mentioned in this article didn't happen, but the linking of them into some sort of narrative about how "power really flows" at Google is specious and most obviously a not-so-subtle ploy for impressions. tl;dr: Google = pageviews, sex = pageviews, Google + sex = PAGEVIEWS