i think you are switching the cards here.. the elitist license is GPL, not BSD.. theres no license more free than BSD (except MIT maybe?) and the reason they ca

i think you are switching the cards here.. the elitist license is GPL, not BSD.. theres no license more free than BSD (except MIT maybe?) and the reason they cant use GPL, its because GPL dont allow no GPL licenses with it... so what they should do? change all their more liberal license for GPL? One of the good reasons to like BSD´s is because of its licence, not the opposite