3 ms·
I'm not against the patents, but I think there should also exist a revenue limit, and whenever a patent reaches either the time or the revenue limit, get invali
by Aldo_MX 13y ago
I'm not against the patents, but I think there should also exist a revenue limit, and whenever a patent reaches either the time or the revenue limit, get invalidated automatically.
- frozenport 13y agoRevenue is impossible to compute. For example, can Windows OS sales be attributed to a patent on MS Office?
- cmsmith 13y agoOh I'm sorry, we haven't actually made any revenue on that patent because it's owned by our subsidiary 'PatentCom' which charges us a license fee of $1/yr to use it.
- johnward 13y agoI don't think revenue would work. I say just make it a very short period of time. enough for the inventor to get a jump start and then open it up to benefit all.
- nova 13y agoI am against patents in general, and specially in software, but I can see there is no way to change the system the way politics and lobbying work. So maybe we should try another approach, something every government likes: taxes. Let's add a tax on patents please. (Maybe copyright too, specially of old (>10 years) works.) A big yearly tax for every patent you own. It's the only way I can imagine to put some slowdown to the cancerous growth of IP.