3 ms·
Sounds like the oft-repeated cry of the C-based language dev in regards to a lack of exceptions in Go. The blog and comments here have summed this debate up ni
by brianbarker 13y ago
Sounds like the oft-repeated cry of the C-based language dev in regards to a lack of exceptions in Go.
The blog and comments here have summed this debate up nicely: http://uberpython.wordpress.com/2012/09/23/why-im-not-leaving-python-for-go/ http://uberpython.wordpress.com/2012/09/23/why-im-not-leavin...
- bsg75 13y agoLinked in that article (http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/code-used-time-used-shapes.php http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/code-used-time-...) is a comparison of conciseness and performance. Interesintgly the FP languages are put in a right-more / less-concise column than Go, C, C++ (unless I am reading it wrong). Since the verbosity of error handling in Go is part of the debate here, are not FP languages often more concise? Is "concise-ness" really an issue?