3 ms·
Good points. I think they're all pretty awful (relatively speaking, if one is doing more than getting plastered), but somehow only the one gets the negative con
by yareally 13y ago
Good points. I think they're all pretty awful (relatively speaking, if one is doing more than getting plastered), but somehow only the one gets the negative connotation. Though, I will admit my early college years I did drink them all at some point regrettably, even at least one PBR that I know of offhand.
- omegaham 13y agoCall me strange, but there are times when I am honestly happy to get a Bud Light. It's cheap, very light, and still gives me a "You're drinking a beer" feeling. It's relaxing. I definitely prefer Sierra Nevada, Stone IPA, and Harpoon to Bud Light 95% of the time, but there are days when it's 115 degrees out and my mind says "I want beer-flavored water." The worst beer, by far, is heavy beer that tastes like garbage. I can drink Natty Light and be happy; I cannot drink a heavy beer that tastes bad.
- te_chris 13y agoOutside of America I can assure that bud and miller both have very negative connotations ;)
- jlgreco 13y agoNegative connotations as in "these are very bad beers", or negative connotations as in "anyone who drinks these must be wildly uncool"? The first exists in the US, but the second doesn't really (outside a few circles typically called 'beer snobs' ;).
- te_chris 13y agoThe first, it also tends to extend to most american beer (excluding some of the bigger craft ones which have made it out of the states) and cars, in my personal experience. Although for a perverse few who idolise american culture, bud etc are aspirational, so each to their own I guess?
- TheLegace 13y agoAs a Canadian, where I think beer has a more logical percentage ;) I agree. I've been to Utah and see what kind of nonsense they do with beer.