3 ms·
A strange example. Does the author really think hashtagifying the word 'content' has improved the tweet in some way? Do they expect people to be searching Twit
by joosters 13y ago
A strange example. Does the author really think hashtagifying the word 'content' has improved the tweet in some way? Do they expect people to be searching Twitter for #content and getting some useful results?
- shlomib 13y agohttps://twitter.com/search?q=%23Content https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Content
- dtauzell 13y agoYou can even get a #content t-shirt: http://bunnyaimee.tumblr.com/post/61678190440/we-opted-for-a-nice-pose-haha-buffwoto http://bunnyaimee.tumblr.com/post/61678190440/we-opted-for-a...
- sp332 13y agoContrast with the un-hashtagged version: https://twitter.com/search?q=content https://twitter.com/search?q=content
- gliese1337 13y agoProbably not, but he did disclaim that it was pretty naive and could be improved in many ways. I think it's a pretty darn good first pass. That particular issues comes about from tagging words that are common in the target text without reference to whether or not that's actually significant- i.e., whether it's common in the text just because it's a common word overall, rather than because it's actually an indication of the text subject. That should be pretty easy to fix by comparing with an English word frequency list.
- shlomib 13y agoAgree. Maybe some TF-IDF solution.