4 ms·
Yeah, we all know how effective the bombing of Serbia in 1999 was. The USAF cannot blow up hardened bunkers deep underground. You need boots on the ground to ge
by TriinT 17y ago
Yeah, we all know how effective the bombing of Serbia in 1999 was. The USAF cannot blow up hardened bunkers deep underground. You need boots on the ground to get the job done. And U.S. soldiers and marines would be brutally punished by the North Koreans as soon as they set foot on NK territory. You could count on thousands and thousands of flag-draped zinc caskets. Better keep negotiating until the only option left is the military one.
- javert 17y agoIt's not necessary to destroy all deep bunkers to effectively dismantle NK's nuclear weapons program. I would be stronlgy opposed to a ground invasion. Your post appeals to the straw man fallacy by implying that I support a position I do not.
- TriinT 17y agoThe point I am trying to make is simple: bombing a country is an act of war. If you start a war, you must be ready to face the consequences, including using ground forces to supplement the air raids. NK can't send bombers to attack the U.S. but they can cross the border and engage U.S. forces in SK. This would have to be carefully thought out... I don't have the intel to assess whether an attack on NK would be effective or not, and fortunately I don't have the power to send thousands of kids in harm's way.