3 ms·

That's true. The last time I made that mistake was many years ago with goatse. I also laerned to check links that might be cleverly disguised. Would that they w

That's true. The last time I made that mistake was many years ago with goatse. I also laerned to check links that might be cleverly disguised. Would that they were all as innocent as rick rolls. If I really want to be safe, I open a link up and only look at it with my peripheral vision. It works surprisingly well to classify something as bad without actually taking it all in.

adamnemecek 13y ago
There is this pretty cool research project at Stanford (it's headed by Andrew Ng of the Coursera fame) that uses NLP and machine learning to detect content that the user might prefer not to see. It's still pretty rough around the edges but this demo is pretty cool. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
- michaelwww 13y ago
  I actually really like that song, maybe because I came of age in the 80's. The funniest thing about it is that Rick Astley seems pissed. He should lighten up because nobody remembered anything about him before rick roll and now he's a household name.
  - asdasf 13y ago
    >The funniest thing about it is that Rick Astley seems pissed. Where'd you get that impression? He's been pretty cool about the whole thing last I heard.
    - michaelwww 13y ago
      This was from an interview a few years back. It could have been because he wasn't making any money from it. I haven't kept up, but glad he's embraced it.
      - T-hawk 13y ago
        Astley participated in a rickrolling himself, at the Macy's Thanksgiving parade a few years ago. He popped out of a float in the middle of another musical performance and started singing Never Gonna Give You Up. It was a staged stunt, with a canned background track ready to go, and the TV announcers obviously feigning surprise. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wL-hNMJvcyI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wL-hNMJvcyI
krapp 13y ago
I've thought about something like applying a threshold filter to thumbnails to distort them sufficiently so they're not potentially "offensive" but have it still be apparent if they might contain bad content. It's too difficult a problem for me to actually implement though, and I suspect it could be easily hacked somehow.
- michaelwww 13y ago
  I don't know if there is a service to rate images. Google seems to have the best technology. It seems like it wouldn't be that hard to programmatically upload an image using an api and get a rating back. This might be a way to curtail teen sexting, which is against the law. A parent could for example, admin a setting to change nudie selfies to a Sesame Street character on their way out. Or maybe better yet, process any photographs taken with the cell phone at the time they are taken and make all nudie images turn into Sesame Street characters ;-)
  - krapp 13y ago
    Something like that (but with humans) was discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6075465 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6075465 I don't know if anyone's actually doing it either. I could see Google having the power to pull it off. Though i'm not entirely sure given the current climate of paranoia I'd necessarily want Google keeping track of knowing exactly what and how much inappropriate material can be (even tangentially or erroneously) associated with me. A third party application would be nice but I think it would need to be anonymous - a concept Google seems dead set against.
    - michaelwww 13y ago
      That's true, then Google would have nude pictures of your teenagers.

adamnemecek 13y ago

There is this pretty cool research project at Stanford (it's headed by Andrew Ng of the Coursera fame) that uses NLP and machine learning to detect content that the user might prefer not to see. It's still pretty rough around the edges but this demo is pretty cool. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

michaelwww 13y ago
I actually really like that song, maybe because I came of age in the 80's. The funniest thing about it is that Rick Astley seems pissed. He should lighten up because nobody remembered anything about him before rick roll and now he's a household name.
- asdasf 13y ago
  >The funniest thing about it is that Rick Astley seems pissed. Where'd you get that impression? He's been pretty cool about the whole thing last I heard.
  - michaelwww 13y ago
    This was from an interview a few years back. It could have been because he wasn't making any money from it. I haven't kept up, but glad he's embraced it.
    - T-hawk 13y ago
      Astley participated in a rickrolling himself, at the Macy's Thanksgiving parade a few years ago. He popped out of a float in the middle of another musical performance and started singing Never Gonna Give You Up. It was a staged stunt, with a canned background track ready to go, and the TV announcers obviously feigning surprise. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wL-hNMJvcyI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wL-hNMJvcyI

krapp 13y ago

I've thought about something like applying a threshold filter to thumbnails to distort them sufficiently so they're not potentially "offensive" but have it still be apparent if they might contain bad content. It's too difficult a problem for me to actually implement though, and I suspect it could be easily hacked somehow.

michaelwww 13y ago
I don't know if there is a service to rate images. Google seems to have the best technology. It seems like it wouldn't be that hard to programmatically upload an image using an api and get a rating back. This might be a way to curtail teen sexting, which is against the law. A parent could for example, admin a setting to change nudie selfies to a Sesame Street character on their way out. Or maybe better yet, process any photographs taken with the cell phone at the time they are taken and make all nudie images turn into Sesame Street characters ;-)
- krapp 13y ago
  Something like that (but with humans) was discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6075465 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6075465 I don't know if anyone's actually doing it either. I could see Google having the power to pull it off. Though i'm not entirely sure given the current climate of paranoia I'd necessarily want Google keeping track of knowing exactly what and how much inappropriate material can be (even tangentially or erroneously) associated with me. A third party application would be nice but I think it would need to be anonymous - a concept Google seems dead set against.
  - michaelwww 13y ago
    That's true, then Google would have nude pictures of your teenagers.