4 ms·
I never read the book but apparently it was a favorite of JFK's and he was instrumental in getting the movie made. That explains how something so politically ed
by gruseom 13y ago
I never read the book but apparently it was a favorite of JFK's and he was instrumental in getting the movie made. That explains how something so politically edgy could have come out of Hollywood in 1962—it had the President vouching for it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/14/movies/film-a-co-production-of-sinatra-and-jfk.html?pagewanted=all http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/14/movies/film-a-co-productio... <-- Contains Spoilers
- DanielBMarkham 13y agoJust a nit, but there was nothing special about Hollywood in 1962. Hollywood has always been a "cool kids" club, and JFK was right in the middle of it. What we see over time is that various people are considered cool kids or not, and the cool kids all like one thing or another, but Hollywood in the 50s and 60s wasn't some kind of propaganda machine, although folks today make it out to be. It was just that's what all the cool kids were doing back then. There was some really edgy stuff made in the 50s and 60s.