5 ms·
JSDB.io – A Database of JavaScript Libraries
- joemir 13y agoWould be great if all the packages on Bower were presented like this.
- nvk 13y ago+1
- ksokhan 13y agoPotentially each item could have a bower package name or endpoint that you can copy and paste into terminal?
- nvk 13y agoThat sounds great, would definitely save some time.
- jonaldomo 13y agoI like the design of this site. I actually use the bower search site http://sindresorhus.com/bower-components/ http://sindresorhus.com/bower-components/ and cdnjs http://cdnjs.com/ http://cdnjs.com/ as a listing of javascript libraries also. I would like to see the three merged.
- deweller 13y agoLooks like 531 libraries are in this list as of now.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- knes 13y agoThank you for this. I just discovered http://fooplugins.com/footable-demos/ http://fooplugins.com/footable-demos/ and it's the perfect alternative to Data Table!
- dracoli 13y agoWhat's the calculation for the ratings? Also would be great if there are sorting options. Otherwise this is really great!
- ksokhan 13y agothree sorting options: recent, popular, trending. What kind of sorting were you looking for?
- Lerc 13y agoIt struck me, while browsing that, I would like to be able to browse the libraries by excluding known types. Things like "Show me all the things that are not frameworks or jQuery plugins" I'm not looking for anything in particular, but it would nice to see the possibilities without having to search through things that I know I'm not looking for today.
- ksokhan 13y agoRight, what you are looking for is advanced filtering options. Definitely something thats desirable, albeit hard to pull off for a side project ;)
- camus 13y agoConfusing name. It's not a db engine built with javascript.
- manojlds 13y agoMy favorite ( though only for jquery plugins ) - http://www.unheap.com/ http://www.unheap.com/
- joeblau 13y agoThat site looks clean! Do you know who developed it?
- kanakiyajay 13y agoSimilar database of jquery plugins http://jquer.in/ http://jquer.in/
- andrew_gardener 13y agohovering over ratings: "Overall JSDB.io Rating (derrived from combination of the other metrics)" So I guess that means the rating are based on some formula of: stars + average time between commit + forks + contributes My only problem is that doesn't this rating favor larger projects (Angular or Ember) as opposed to smaller projects that are perfect for solving small problems? The only way I can see around that is if stars has an overwhelming weight in the formula. Anyways, looks helpful none the less (will look though it)
- ksokhan 13y agoHey! (I made this) Stars do have more rating than the other metrics, which evens things out. Yes, larger libraries like jQuery are rating higher because of the ranking system, but thats actually accurate if you are looking at 'popularity'; furthermore, there are only a few projects that are on this scale. Try 'trending' if you want to see libraries that are growing quickly.
- KevinEldon 13y agoLooks great. I've had luck with http://www.javascriptoo.com/ http://www.javascriptoo.com/ too.
- jb55 13y agoIt's unfortunate that people still think they need monolithic libraries to get anything done on the client side. The node ecosystem showed this doesn't have to be the case. It becomes even more important on the client side to keep dependencies small. My favourite ecosystem for client side development these days is component (https://github.com/component/component https://github.com/component/component). It's similar in style to npm but faster and made for building apps from small modular pieces. It has a growing community and lots of modules already (https://github.com/component/component/wiki/Components https://github.com/component/component/wiki/Components).
- graue 13y agoI've had this debate with a friend who's a big proponent of EmberJS (and to a lesser degree Angular). My friend feels that without one of these libraries you will simply be writing way too much unnecessary boilerplate code for a single-page app of significant size. I personally prefer to rely on small modular dependencies, so Component appeals to me, but I've only played with Ember/Angular a little bit so I don't necessarily know what I'm missing. Can you recommend a set of Components that would provide similar functionality and productivity?
- jb55 13y agoI'm still using backbone.js within our app but a lot of people seem to be using things like: * https://github.com/component/view https://github.com/component/view for views built on top of reactive for declarative bindings * https://github.com/component/model https://github.com/component/model for models * https://github.com/component/router https://github.com/component/router for routing So what we have so far from these 3 libraries is basically a decomposed backbone with declarative bindings. That will cover 99% of your typical app. I don't find there is too much boilerplate.
- graue 13y agoTake a look at the Ember examples at http://emberjs.com/ http://emberjs.com/. They're doing a lot more with a lot less code. Backbone had its day, but the world is moving on, and a new project that only offers Backbone-equivalent functionality won't garner much interest from me or probably anyone.
- dotneter 13y agohttp://jster.net/ http://jster.net/