4 ms·
Sounds like they used points similar to Kevin O'Connor's RICO lawsuit: 'Lumen didn't do "any meaningful pre-filing investigation"...he company's expert witness
by Sniperfish 13y ago
Sounds like they used points similar to Kevin O'Connor's RICO lawsuit:
'Lumen didn't do "any meaningful pre-filing investigation"...he company's expert witness not only hadn't investigated FindTheBest's services—he'd never heard of the target company, according to O'Connor.' (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/09/angry-entrepreneur-replies-to-patent-troll-with-racketeering-lawsuit/ http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/09/angry-entrepreneu...)
Compare to:
'The key to his response is that Dovden's case was made up of off-theshelf pieces, careless about details and indifferent to exactly what Dunkelman's BusBuddy app does...' (article)
True Larry Dunkelman's is a Canadian case but it will be interesting to see if there is consistent value in this line of defense against patent trolls.