4 ms·
You see, all of the "trivial points" that you mention in the link above are all assumptions on your side, but not facts [1]. You keep calling me a liar, when a
by pipy 13y ago
You see, all of the "trivial points" that you mention in the link above are all assumptions on your side, but not facts [1].
You keep calling me a liar, when all of my statements are supported by extensive footnotes with verifiable evidence. You keep calling me a Putin and Assad shill, when in fact none of the footnotes that I've provided point to pro-Russian, or pro-Assad sources.
At this point discussion with you becomes pointless, since it is the basic logic itself that you don't follow.
On the point of your note about calling the police: IMO, this is a hilarious, `fahrenheit-451-esque` statement. Or, I should say, it would be hilarious if it weren't so sad.
[1] On Difference between facts and assumptions: http://infotrac.thomsonlearning.com/infowrite/wr_facts.html http://infotrac.thomsonlearning.com/infowrite/wr_facts.html
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- berntb 13y ago>> You see, all of the "trivial points" that you mention in the link above are all assumptions on your side, but not facts [1]. I've answered similar garbage repeatedly, so I'll just quote myself: "As I've written five++ times, it is not only my motivation -- it is the Obama administration's motivation. So your long argument why you don't need to quote and answer that goes also for the main US motivation... THE thing to argue against, you refuse to touch!" >>basic logic itself that you don't follow I answered that before too, another quote of myself: "That you call trivial game theory "illogical" makes it even better."