5 ms·
Corrected, should be available soon. https://github.com/s-macke/jor1k/commit/1285da3247a1a92f6638fc8d48bf9f68b0b0daab https://github.com/s-macke/jor1k/commit/1
by s-macke 13y ago
Corrected, should be available soon.
https://github.com/s-macke/jor1k/commit/1285da3247a1a92f6638fc8d48bf9f68b0b0daab https://github.com/s-macke/jor1k/commit/1285da3247a1a92f6638...
- kevingadd 13y agoOh wow, you wrote it all by hand? That's really impressive! :) If the standalone asm.js validator isn't yelling about that and Firefox 25 is, you should let the people who maintain the validator know. They're supposed to be in sync.
- s-macke 13y agoYes, programmed the asm.js core by hand. It was not too hard. One day. The asm.js is also a little bit outdated. It could be around 20% faster. I have never used the standalone asm.js validator. Not even knew, that it exists. The optimizing work in Javascript is really hard. Every few weeks there is a new browser and new mystic speed issues. Firefox 22 without asm.js was the fastest six weeks ago (30-60 MIPS). Then everything changed. And I don't know why. Even the IE is faster than Firefox (without asm.js) right now.
- kevingadd 13y agoYeah, I've had the same experience. I applaud your persistence! Hopefully asm.js will eventually let you avoid babysitting your code with every browser release.
- binarymax 13y agoVery impressive work. I saw Brendan Eich speak At jquery uk in April and he said asm.js was meant for compilers and people should not be programming it directly...I couldn't help but smile and think 'oh yeah?'