3 ms·
Tyson is right from business perspective. There is no business value in going to Mars. There are only rocks there and even if you sell ad space from the rocked
by hannibal5 13y ago
Tyson is right from business perspective. There is no business value in going to Mars. There are only rocks there and even if you sell ad space from the rocked and get sponsor, it will not cover the risk × value. If business is going into space, it's going to near earth asteroids. Cheap to operate lifting capability is essential to everything related to space and SpaceX is doing right thing there.
I don't think manned mission to Mars should be priority for NASA either. "You absolutely have to have person there to decide what to do" argument is not convincing if you would spend the same amount of money for robotic missions to Mars and it's moons.
- dalke 13y agoI agree. I think James Cameron's trip to the Challenger deep in 2012 is quite apropos. No one had been there since the Trieste in 1960, though there were a couple of ROV visits. I believe it's not that we couldn't have put more people there, but rather that there's no good scientific (or government/military) reason to do so. ROVs have been more cost effective.