4 ms·
If that is what was meant, then I'd argue it should not read as "not viable for games" but instead "not viable for the Steam business"
by rlu 13y ago
If that is what was meant, then I'd argue it should not read as "not viable for games" but instead "not viable for the Steam business"
- jlgreco 13y agoWith many (likely most) PC gamers having sunk many thousands of dollars into their Steam library, those are the same thing. Foolish on their part? Probably. However that seems to be the current situation anyway.