3 ms·
While the article in general is great, the author’s assumption of one true time is rather cute :). At the very least, there are: - the actual number of second
by claudius 13y ago
While the article in general is great, the author’s assumption of one true time is rather cute :).
At the very least, there are:
- the actual number of seconds that passed since the epoch, i.e. the number a perfect egg timer would show if you had set it off at 12 AM on 1970-01-01.
- International Atomic Time (IAT), the closest thing to the aforementioned egg timer we currently have (though with some offset, naturally).
- Terrestrial Time (TT), which is 32.odd seconds ahead of IAT, apparently for historical reasons.
- Universial Time (UT<timezoneoffset>), which is supposed to be the solar time at one particular location, Greenwhich for UT1.
- Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), probably the closest thing to The One True Time, which jumps around merrily depending on the rotational speed of Earth, trying to keep days of 86400 SI seconds.
Oh, and we’re not even considering relativistic effects here.
- pdonis 13y agoI would actually say that "perfect egg timer" time is the closest thing to The One True Time, if such a thing were actually possible (of course it isn't, due to the relativistic effects you mention).
- claudius 13y agoWell, yes, but the author equated (in my reading) The One True Time with the wall time/time provided by NTP and such, which clearly jumps around and is UTC. The ‘perfect egg timer’ is, if anything, comparable to the monotonic clocks.
- caf 13y agoThe usual acronym for International Atomic Time is TAI (Temps Atomique International)
- claudius 13y agoApologies & thanks for the heads-up! :)