3 ms·
Strawman. The parent isn't arguing that the new async constructs in the language don't make asynchronous programming easier. He's questioning the need for usi
by statictype 13y ago
Strawman.
The parent isn't arguing that the new async constructs in the language don't make asynchronous programming easier.
He's questioning the need for using asynchronous programming models at all, for the common use case of ASP.NET applications.
- coldtea 13y ago>The parent isn't arguing that the new async constructs in the language don't make asynchronous programming easier. He's questioning the need for using asynchronous programming models at all, for the common use case of ASP.NET applications. And, my comment questions this very idea that for language constructs to be added there has to be a "need". They is never a hard need. We can do everything with assembly. Language constructs are added to make things easier. And that includes ASP.NET applications. His might not have a use for patterns made easier by async, but others do, especially those doing real time websockety stuff.