2 ms·
The argument should be, is the DARE propaganda misrepresenting the science or not? The "other" FA actually covered some nuance, but the news, for those of us wh
by cardiffspaceman 13y ago
The argument should be, is the DARE propaganda misrepresenting the science or not? The "other" FA actually covered some nuance, but the news, for those of us who did not know about this study 35 years ago even though they were actively reading things, is that rats might need a bad environment to be prone to prefer morphine to food. Which is not what the prevalent message was over the past 3 decades.