> Every utterance, every decision has the inherent option of an opposition. To the extent this is meaningful at all, it implies that it is not true in the slig

> Every utterance, every decision has the inherent option of an opposition. To the extent this is meaningful at all, it implies that it is not true in the slightest, which makes it difficult to take seriously. > This is not fundamentally different to the scientific method. The atom was thought to be the smallest, inseperable unit (hence the name) before it could be found. However, in finding the atom, we realised that it is, indeed, made up of smaller parts, which in turn are again made up of smaller parts. Until that process bottomed out, of course, and bottomed out based on evidence, not philosophy.