I think satire is the wrong way to approach this. It makes the author seem kind of immature and I really doubt it would do much to get the point across to the l

I think satire is the wrong way to approach this. It makes the author seem kind of immature and I really doubt it would do much to get the point across to the likes of the author of the article this was in response to. The cherry picking of historical examples seems kind of weak and takes a lot of space. It actually seems to emphasize how few female programmers there were in history because it can only name a few cases of historical notability and totally ignores all the work they built on top of. It really seems to try and be misleading, not just satirical. How does this help anything?