4 ms·
There was a honking big difference between pseudo-science and this blog post, and it was right at the start. Specifically: "So I decided to find out - and I d
by demallien 13y ago
There was a honking big difference between pseudo-science and this blog post, and it was right at the start. Specifically:
"So I decided to find out - and I did! "
Followed up by a link to a published scientific article. Seriously, I don't know what your complaint is. There's a nice dry scientific paper, and a blog post with a more accessible tone. This seems like a pretty good mix of the different types of media (putting aside for now the issue of the paper being behind a bloody paywall).
- jared314 13y agoSee my response to Dylan16807 [1], as he had a similar question. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6388337 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6388337
- demallien 13y agoYour reply to Jared is talking about quoting out of context. There is no quoting in this case. The guy is simply introducing the research paper that he himself wrote and got published. Seriously I have no idea what on earth you're going on about.