Now you're thinking about the nominal definition of "better", but I think you underestimate the scope of and importance people give to aesthetics. But none of

Now you're thinking about the nominal definition of "better", but I think you underestimate the scope of and importance people give to aesthetics. But none of that really matters because in the next ontological step we question the definition of definitions. [1] And if you look into it, the smartest people in history haven't really gotten any closer to putting debates like these to rest. [1]http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/definitions/ http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/definitions/