4 ms·
I read through the common resolution but I just can't get why you need all this. The problem seems to be at the start: you select one of two amounts, then you s
by dools 13y ago
I read through the common resolution but I just can't get why you need all this. The problem seems to be at the start: you select one of two amounts, then you say the other amount is either double or half what you chose.
That means you have 3 amounts in the equation: 0.5x, x and 2x. But in reality there are only 2 amounts: x and 2x.
So you have to state the problem like: you choose an envelope. The other envelope either contains x or 2x. It can't contain 0.5x because that amount never existed in the first place.
- Osmium 13y agoUnless you picked 2x to start with, in which case the other envelope does contain half of what you chose... i.e. there are two envelopes, x and 2x, and you choose one. There is a 50% chance that the envelope you didn't choose is half the value of the one you picked (you pick 2x, and the other is x), or there's a 50% chance the envelope you didn't choose is twice the value of the one you picked (you pick x, and the other is 2x). I think it's misleading to introduce this "third" quantity of 0.5x... but perhaps I'm missing something subtle, in which case I'd be happy to be corrected!
- dools 13y agoI think it's misleading to introduce this "third" quantity of 0.5x Yes, it is misleading, that's my point :) Put it another way: you have two quantities in two envelopes, A and B. If you choose B, what is the probability that the other envelope contains a 3rd quantity, C? The probably of that is zero, because C was not present in the initial two envelopes. Still another way of putting it: I will place $10 in an envelope, and $20 in another envelope, then ask you to choose one. What are the chances that the other envelope contains $40? The chance of that is zero, because the only two amounts present at the start of the trick were $10 and $20.