3 ms·
> they would still be paying $4500/week I don't understand this. If you are paying: $1500 for a 30 hour week +$2000 for administration costs -------------
by pyre 13y ago
> they would still be paying $4500/week
I don't understand this. If you are paying:
$1500 for a 30 hour week
+$2000 for administration costs
-------------------------------
$3500
Am I missing something on how changing the $2000/week pay to $1500/week makes the price go up by $500/week?
- kaybe 13y agoIt's a typo I reckon, but the original point seems valid to me. It would be better to hire one person for 40 hrs than 2 for 20 hours each because of the overhead.
- ajb 13y agoYeah, sorry, it's a typo. Will fix.
- lifeisstillgood 13y agoit's per hour costing: 2000 /wk labour 2000 /wk overhead ---- 4000 /wk @40hrs/wk 100 / hr vs 1500 /wk labour 2000 /wk overhead ---- 3500 /wk @30hr/wk 115 ish / hr