Sure, Thomas, I'll bite. I think Andrew did a good job of exploring the question of asking people to help an individual, when their dollars would be better spe

Sure, Thomas, I'll bite. I think Andrew did a good job of exploring the question of asking people to help an individual, when their dollars would be better spent on issue-focussed NGOs/charities (defined as greatest good for greatest number of people/tackling systemic issues). He quotes a UC Berkeley economist to frame the criticism , invites rebuttal from Watsi Though Andrew's inclination initially resides with the economists's argument, he concludes that Watsi's model isn't likely to siphon off money that would go to a charity like Mercy Corps. He concludes, based on an interview with Watsi, that it appeals in a different way and thus isn't using a cheap fundraising model that hurts more effective charities. Whether you agree or not with my assessment, there's no need for the donation via bet -- but if you are inclined to find another avenue for your charitable donations, I do like Mercy Corps. Sincerely, A-Sometimes-Fan-Of-Silicon-Valley