3 ms·

No, it is not. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/01/supreme-court-holds-warrantless-gps-tracking-unconstitutional/ http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/201

• codex 13y ago
  That ruling did not consider whether a warrant is required, only that the attachment of the device constituted a "search" because the government was trespassing when they installed it (http://lippmannwouldroll.com/2012/01/28/what-the-supreme-courts-gps-case-actually-says/ http://lippmannwouldroll.com/2012/01/28/what-the-supreme-cou...).