4 ms·
> The apparent FBI-malware attack was first noticed on August 4, when all of the hidden service sites hosted by Freedom Hosting began displaying a “Down for Mai
by powertower 13y ago
> The apparent FBI-malware attack was first noticed on August 4, when all of the hidden service sites hosted by Freedom Hosting began displaying a “Down for Maintenance” message.
The underlining reason for this has been the notion that the FBI was attempting to catch people engaged in CP related activities...
This maybe a little tin-foil here, but...
If you deliver a 404-type of a page on all requests, no website is traversed, no CP is viewed, transferred, replicated, or distributed. Meaning there is nothing here to charge the person with.
Does this article get the facts wrong, or was the purpose of this exploit something entirely different. Because if the article is true (this exploit was only in "Down for Maintenance" pages, which were the only pages served), all they did was get a bunch of useless IP to MAC to host-name correlation/mapping data for that moment in time.
There is also the 'Fruit of a poisonous tree' argument here. Would this untargeted hacking even stand up in court if this data is used to prosecute someone?
This sounds more like flexing of the muscles - the FBI saying we can get you if we want to. Or something else was going on. It also seems like a waist of a good exploit that they would probably use towards terrorist or national security related issues (ex: if they knew the MAC or host-name of a bad guy using TOR that day, but did not know his IP / so they put this out).
- sillysaurus2 13y agoThe way Tor works is that anyone can set up something called a "hidden service". It's basically a website that can only be visited by using Tor. These websites have a unique URL. For example, Bitcoin Fog's URL is http://fogcore5n3ov3tui.onion/ http://fogcore5n3ov3tui.onion/ If you try to visit that using a standard web browser, it won't work. But if you use Tor browser, then it takes you to the Bitcoin Fog hidden service. Some of those websites were devoted specifically to delivering CP. Now the FBI's reasoning goes like this: anyone who was visiting those websites were very likely visiting them for the purpose of looking at CP. The FBI delivered an exploit designed to identify as many of those people as possible. So even though no CP was being served, people were still accessing the URL. The malware collected the MAC address and hostname of the computer, then submitted that info to an FBI server. So those people were apparently added to a centralized FBI database. One way that database might be powerful is if e.g. a politician (or any other government worker) were was identified as a visitor of one of these websites, because whoever controls that database now controls them.
- Geee 13y agoYes, it's reasonable to think that their goal was to just inject the iframe and keep the pages running, but something went wrong and pages were pulled down to maintenance mode. This might also be what actually happened, but it wasn't noticed until after the maintenance pages were served and someone went looking at the source.