I just wanted to say that you shouldn't necessarily see his cynicism as a bad thing (he's probably just confused good journalistic skepticism with the cynicism

I just wanted to say that you shouldn't necessarily see his cynicism as a bad thing (he's probably just confused good journalistic skepticism with the cynicism that mediocre journalists think will make them "hard-hitting"). IMO, he comes across as so cynical that he actually loses the reader, which just builds a more sympathetic case for Watsi. If you were hoping to win over idealists with this interview, that I'd say you might even be better off with this article rather than one that is overly fawning.