> You can be accurate yet misleading. True, but on the general topic of misleading, that should have been the submission's headline. If an original source misl

> You can be accurate yet misleading. True, but on the general topic of misleading, that should have been the submission's headline. If an original source misleads with facts, and someone wants to call them out, they had better not also mislead with facts. It might have been better to say "WSJ cherry-picks its facts" or something like that -- something that acknowledges the factual basis of the account, but worded to avoid the very thing it accuses the WSJ of doing.