4 ms·
More like 10 years ago. Your information is about 6 years out of date. They sold or suspended money losing brands like Jaguar, Land Rover, and Volvo. They refin
by yardie 13y ago
More like 10 years ago. Your information is about 6 years out of date. They sold or suspended money losing brands like Jaguar, Land Rover, and Volvo. They refinanced the company back in 2005 by selling their factories and renting it back from the new owners. Nothing changed, just the title on the deed, and they were hundreds millions of dollars richer. At the congressional autos bailout hearing they were there to to support GM and Chrysler in acquiring TARP loans. Because if either of those companies failed it would send a shockwave in the supply chain.
> Even better would be to sell the company to its employees. That has worked very well for similar companies.
American Airlines is employee owned and that has worked out smashingly, not!
$190B assets / 170k employees = $1.11mm/employee. I doubt the average line worker has that kind of money on hand.
- easytiger 13y ago> Jaguar, Land Rover, and Volvo I'm not saying it is indicative of anything, but having been released from Ford those brands are now doing very very well.
- ssmoot 13y agoIs Volvo? My wife has an XC90. She previously had an S40. I've had two C70's (both generations) and an S80. So you might get the impression I generally like Volvo and would be happy to hear this. ;-) It was my impression they were on their way out of the US market though.
- woobar 13y agoAll three are parts of big asian holdings now. So it hard to tell how good are they on their own. - Volvo is losing money - Jaguar lost 60% of unit sales in last 10 years. - Land Rover actually improved, up 30%